> I hate to speak for Ted, but even though he used the word SYSPLEX along > with MASPLEX, I'm pretty sure he was referring specifically to having more > than 5 systems in a MAS with the checkpoint on DASD instead of in a CF. > > You snipped this part of his post: > > "I recommend that, if you have that many, or more that you consider > putting it into a CF."
Yes he did and I apologize. I was focused on the sysplex part, not the MAS part. Putting that into the CF is the natural thing (to me) and I reacted to the wrong thing. Sorry. CC ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
