Thanks to all who responded.  I will voice my opinion when I get access to the 
JES2 SHARE Requirements Database.



___________________________________________ 
Jim Petersen
MVS - Lead Systems Engineer 
Home Depot Technology Center
1300 Park Center Drive, Austin, TX 78753
www.homedepot.com
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
512-977-2615 direct
512-977-2930 fax 
210-859-9887 cell 

This message may contain confidential information. The information contained in 
this message and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the 
addressee(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, any 
disclosure, copying, distribution or other use of the contents of this message 
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify 
the sender immediately by email and delete all copies of this message



-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
Robert A. Rosenberg
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 4:59 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: $HASP443 message


At 13:24 -0500 on 05/09/2007, Rick Fochtman wrote about Re: $HASP443 message:

>-----------------------<snip>----------------------------
>
>>Yes. Thanks to both of you for responding.   I found the error of my
>>ways and did a $tspooldef and changed it to ALLOWED.   Now I have
>>another question.  Is there a command which I can use to cause a spool 
>>volume to quit being used but redistribute what is on it to the 
>>remaining spool volumes?
>> 
>>
>-----------------------<unsnip>-------------------------
>You can stop it from accepting new datasets by the $PSPOOL command, but 
>there's no command to remove its contents and distribute them to 
>another volume.
>
>Sure would be nice, though.............

This type of thing would not be that hard to do with a User Written 
Command. The simple way would be to scan the output (and input?) 
queue to spot who is allocated on the Volume. The command can then 
just set the job to be spool offloaded. This will clean off all but 
executing (and pending execution) jobs. You then repopulate the 
queues via Spool Reload. The "Better" way would be to read the data 
and rewrite it freeing up the old allocation (Since doing this 
correctly is so complex, the SPOOL OFFLOAD/RELOAD route is simpler 
IMO).

As to doing the redistribute on-the-fly, I'd check the JES2 Mods tape 
since I have the vague impression that I saw such a mod on it in the 
past.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at 
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to