----- Original Message ----- From: "Neal Eckhardt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 4:18 PM
Subject: Re: Top 10 software install gripes


On 11 May 2007 12:17:17 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom
Marchant) wrote:

On Fri, 11 May 2007 11:21:13 -0500, Thomas Conley wrote:

#4 - Directory blocks should ALWAYS be a multiple of 45. That way I won't
get directory out of space the next time you expand your product.

ITYM because a 3390 track will hold 45 directory blocks. That might or moght not mean that you won't run out of directory space, though. Certainly, I think a direcrtory should have room to allow for more members or more information in
the user data.

My gripe is that there is NO REASON for a vendor to be stingy with
directory blocks. I hate it when the initial install goes OK, then the
first maintenance tape causes me 5 runs because 4 datasets run out of
directory blocks.

You'd think that they were paying for the disk space.


Neal,

THANK YOU!!!!!!!! I took so much crap for this one. Guess you and I are the only ones that think running out of directory blocks during maintenance because the initial install specified 10 is stupid.

Regards,
Tom Conley
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to