>Do you mean only that there are no plans to do so, or that a >requirement, if submitted, would probably be rejected?
>I understand that you need to resolve the PARMLIB concatenation before >you can provide full symbol support, but substituting only &SYSR1 and >possibly allowing symbol definitions in LOADxx should be less work. >Would you advise the OP to submit a requirement, or is it a lost >cause? I always recommend submitting requirements. Even if the initial one is rejected, we still might choose to implement it in the future as business plans (and/or customer needs) change. Having it "on the books" is often a necessary first step. And a requirement from a group, such as Share, will likely be given more weight than one from an individual. Peter Relson z/OS Core Technology Design ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
