This does not seem to be about an IEBCOPY Unloaded dataset. Which by now we know the RECFM(VS) nature of the unloaded dataset will not traverse to a PC and back asis. It must be processed into a RECFM format that the PC based file transfer applications can use.
I am surprised someone who posts so many responses to keep on topic would go off on this tangent. On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 07:03:49 -0300, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) <shmuel+ibm- [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Others answered, taking my last phrase out of context, > >No. The context is what is in the message, not what is in messages >earlier in the thread. What is relevant is the validity of what you >wrote, not what inspired you to write it. > >>and using phrases such as > >PKB. If you want people to be polite, then take them seriously and >don't accuse them of, e.g., "arrant sophistry" just because you >disagree with what they write. > >>and insisting that only an AMASPZAP dump can show differences >>between two files, when differences are obvious in ISPF BROWSE. > >The fact that you don't understand it doesn't make it wrong. > >>Much in there I find disrespectful. > >Some find your attacks on IBM disrespectful. I certainly felt that >"arrant sophistry" was disrespectful enough to invite a response in >kind, about which you are now hypocritically whining. > >-- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT > ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> >We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. >(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
