Oops! It seems I've violated O'Brien's law of forum decorum.
Please accept my humble apologies.
From: "O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU>
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SYSTERM to DSN
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 13:41:27 -0400
Rather than 'suspect', why don't we wait for Daniel to supply the requested
information.
________________________________
From: J R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 6/4/2007 1:25 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SYSTERM to DSN
I suspect that the immediate command responses are not
the ones at issue. There are also the asynchronous ones
emanating from the HSM address space. In this case, the
solution proposed by Lizette may be a better approach.
>From: "O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU>
>To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
>Subject: Re: SYSTERM to DSN
>Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 12:52:34 -0400
>
>Daniel,
>
> Could you supply more info as to what HSM commands are involved? Some
>such as HLIST lend themselves to output datasets - see ODS parameter.
>
>Others such as Delete, Bdelete, Rceall and Recover don't support ODS and
>are better served submitting in batch via IKJEFT01.
>
>________________________________
>
_________________________________________________________________
Dont miss your chance to WIN $10,000 and other great prizes from Microsoft
Office Live http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/aub0540003042mrt/direct/01/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
