Hmmm.  I'm not a storage administrator, but I thought that one of the reasons 
to allocate a data set as extended was so that the allocation *could* exceed 
the size of any one volume in the storage group by striping the pieces to fit 
on the selected volumes.  No?

And, for what it's worth, SMS L2 confirmed that OA20446 should correct the 
problem that I described in a prior post about this.

Larre

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to