On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 07:28:52 -0400, Peter Relson wrote: >Minor chide: It is too bad that folks take their valuable time on ibm-main > Cf. the "Heresy" thread.
>to point out deficiencies in the documentation (pointing out is a good >thing) but then do not submit requests to get them updated. The reason we > Chiding accepted and RCF submitted against R8 rather than R7, and mentioning 3 other publications in which a string search turned up similar usage. >in IBM follow and participate in ibm-main is not for the purpose of seeing >what pub updates are being suggested. Please help! > But some assessment from my peers (IBM and customers) helps me decide whether my observations are valid. >>The meaning would be clearer if the two adjectives were omitted and it >>simply said "any character". > >I agree with the suggestion and will check into getting it changed. > You're off the hook, and if you've yet taken no action, it would be interesting to let it run its course and see whether Tech Pubs agrees with us. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
