Feel guilty if the admonisher has never posted anything with less than 100% accuracy and so completely simple to understand that the thread required no further discussion.
The rest of us are human. Sounds like you realize the point and learned from his suggestion so move on as the better person you now are. On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 10:00:59 -0500, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I recently received an off-list message admonishing me for an incorrect >attribution. I grant that I trimmed hastily, but I don't know how guilty >I should feel. The lines I misattributed appeared in a message from the >misattributee, apparently, I see now, in a citation of an earlier message, >but without the conventional "> " quotation indicators, and interspersed >with quotations of an earlier message so marked (but with one level of >quotes, not two). It's too easy a mistake to make. > >-- gil > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO >Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
