Paul Gilmartin wrote:
I elided too much, and I believe you exploited the omission.
This is a curious argument. I certainly did attack and dispose of what he
wrote and not what I thought he might perhaps have meant to write, although
I did allude to my suspicion that he might well have meant more than he had
written.
Moreover, I must confess to some considerable impatience with this and other
of Mr Gilmartin's posts. He spends too much time (a) whining and (b)
employing what has historically been a Marxist style of argument: Instead
of examining the logic of an opposing position, he tries to discredit it as
a shabby rationalization of some hidden, always odious motive.
John Gilmore
Ashland, MA 01721-1817
USA
_________________________________________________________________
Booking a flight? Know when to buy with airfare predictions on MSN Travel.
http://travel.msn.com/Articles/aboutfarecast.aspx&ocid=T001MSN25A07001
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
