Chris, This is a hard habit to break people of. We are running HP-UX alongside AIX at our shop. I regularly hear that we have "UNIX and AIX" - so much so that I've given up trying to correct them... :-)
Rex -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Mason Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2007 8:55 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Print Distribution and IP connected Devices Ulrich The AIX I knew deserved also to be classified as "UNIX". One possible name server configuration could have been - or could be now - to have the bulk of the corporate names managed by a dedicated, typically traditional UNIX, machine, but to have the "mainframe" environment supported by a Communications Server (CS) IP name server linked into the higher level name server. At the very least the CS IP name server could act as a cache. Chris Mason ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ulrich Krueger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main To: <IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 12:42 AM Subject: Re: Print Distribution and IP connected Devices Ted, In that particular shop, a pair of UNIX (or was it AIX?) servers were used as the corporate DNS servers. All we ran on the mainframe were the usual suspects: FTP, SMTP, Telnet. Even though it was (and still is) the most important data processing environment of the company, the mainframe was never big enough to handle a DNS service task for the entire corporation. Regards, Ulrich Krueger ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
