On 12 Nov 2007 13:48:31 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Berg) wrote: >Hm. I think there is some missunderstanding here. If it's from Your >or my side I'm not sure. But AFAICS there is no possibility of change >of either the original COPY or *what* COPY we could use in our programs. >(It's only the owner of the copy that can/are allowed to do the change, >and it is not in his interest (rightfully so) to do a change in the way >we need.
I think we all understand this. But we are saying that the nature of the CoBOL copy statement (at least the version that I have) is that unless the copy library was designed with foresight, you're SOL. How many copy members have you created designed for the REPLACING option? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
