On 14 Dec 2007 09:50:15 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:

>-------------------------<snip>--------------------
>Why the UNPRINTABLE should services for what should be a basic data set 
>type NOT be in the Nucleus?
>-------------------------<unsnip>-------------------
>That all depends on how large you want NIP and the nucleus to be. 
>Personally, I'd rather not see my IPL time extended by services I choose 
>not to use. And since IBM has chosen NOT to show off the details of PDSE 
>support, none of us has a good idea of how large that support needs to 
>be, nor the amount of code necessary to reliably read PDSE members. 
>(Hint, Hint, IBM!!!) :-)

Given that you will be stuck with PDSE for quite some time, putting
the needed code for reading in the Nucleus shouldn't add that much (no
more than a couple of hundred megabytes at disastrously worst).  The
code will be needed.  Also if we are ever to go to FBA, it will have
to be done.
>
>Since other mainframe PCM's have walked away from the 64-bit world, OCO 
>is even more senseless now than it was 20 years ago.
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to