> -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Staller, Allan > Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 11:23 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: WLM question. > > > <snip> > Two words: resource groups. > </snip> > > I am generally opposed to resource groups, however, they do have their > uses. I find them useful for your purpose (guaranteeing a > minimum amount > of service). I do not find them useful for "capping" a workload. > > The drawbacks I see are: > > 1) The specifications are in RAW service units( last I heard) rather > than weighted service units. > > 2) They must be constantly adjusted whenever a processor changes. > > HTH,
In z/OS 1.8, it appears that I can make an RG based on CPU% instead of MSUs. -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer HealthMarkets Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage Administrative Services Group Information Technology The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged and/or confidential. It is for intended addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal offense. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
