Point well taken. I wanted to automate the sending to prevent "oops, I forgot" I would be copied so I could review it.
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 3:29 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Sub-CEC Reports >Directly sending the SCRT reports to IBM without a review has some risk >associated with it. I agree 100%. I was sending SCRT reports to an ISV that used them. But, I always reviewed them before they went. I also attached the CSV to an XL spreadsheet, so I could plot and compare month-to-month. So, they were not only reasonable based on processor capacity, but also compared to trends. When you're depending on this kind of stuff for accounts payable, you'd better review before sending. My automation sent them to me. - Too busy driving to stop for gas! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
