In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 11/03/2007 at 06:09 PM, Ed Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>How could you respect anyone that worked for CA? A bit superficial, what? Yes, CA has done some things that I considered to be unethical[1], but so has IBM. >but to leave a company and essentially sell their name to the evil >empire (and not even announce it) Am I the only one to see an inconsistency there? >I won't get into name calling , You already have. This isn't the first time that somebody I respect has gone to CA. I'll continue to judge Scott by what he does, not by whom he works for, [1] They've also done some things that I consider to be in the public interest, e.g., providing facilities for meetings. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html