In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 11/03/2007
at 06:09 PM, Ed Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>How could you respect anyone that worked for CA?
A bit superficial, what? Yes, CA has done some things that I considered to
be unethical[1], but so has IBM.
>but to leave a company and essentially sell their name to the evil
>empire (and not even announce it)
Am I the only one to see an inconsistency there?
>I won't get into name calling ,
You already have.
This isn't the first time that somebody I respect has gone to CA. I'll
continue to judge Scott by what he does, not by whom he works for,
[1] They've also done some things that I consider to be in the public
interest, e.g., providing facilities for meetings.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
