I know this is a dif sub but also be careful if you are using OSA , we had
a lot of trouble from 2064 - 2094 because IBM changed mach code



                                                                           
             Brian Peterson                                                
             <brian.peterson.i                                             
             [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                          To 
             ET>                       IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU                
             Sent by: IBM                                               cc 
             Mainframe                                                     
             Discussion List                                       Subject 
             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]         Re: most jobs abended with 878-04   
             .EDU>                     after upgrade CPU from 2964 to 2094 
                                       (HELP)                              
                                                                           
             02/18/2008 01:24                                              
             PM                                                            
                                                                           
                                                                           
             Please respond to                                             
               IBM Mainframe                                               
              Discussion List                                              
             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                             
                   .EDU>                                                   
                                                                           
                                                                           




On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 02:11:27 +0800, Tommy Tsui wrote:

>hi all,
>
>we found that many jobs abended with 878-04 after upgrade CPU from 2064
to
>2094 (first day batch) . There are no error when runnng on 2064 machine.
any
>shop have this problem??
>Is there any control-block changed after upgrade CPU??/
>
>any comment will be appreciated
>
>Many thanks
>
>tommy

Perhaps on your 2064, your DASD devices were defined LOCANY YES and on
the 2094 they're defined LOCANY NO?

Parameter/
Feature    Value            R Description
LOCANY     Yes                UCB can reside in 31 bit storage

Brian

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to