I thought the whole idea of using REWORK was so you could reapply a usermod that has info that changes every now and then so that you wouldn't have to change the usermod number every time. When I was at P&H Mining, I had one usermod for CA7 that changed every time we added a dataset to the dataset trigger table. That worked very well to just make change to the usermod, receive it, and reapply it with REWORK. I agree that if you are a company issuing SMP maintained software, that you should SUP the bad PTF instead of changing it and reissuing it.
Eric ---- Kurt Quackenbush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Me too. I suggest you rethink your REWORK strategy and go with a unique > superseding PTF... I think your customers will thank you for it. > > Kurt Quackenbush -- IBM, SMP/E Development -- Eric Bielefeld Systems Programmer Aviva USA Des Moines, Iowa 515-645-5153 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html