On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 1:48 AM, Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:08:53 -0600, Dave Kopischke wrote: > > > >We have a JCL checker application that verifies dataset access for a JOB. > >Through routine use of this product, we end up with thousands of access > >warnings on our daily RACF reports. This is not a hacking attempt. If there > >were hacking attempts occuring, it would be tough to see them through the > >noise though. > > > I wonder that you get "thousands of access warnings ... daily". Are > your programmers commiting so many potential access errors in the course > of coding their JCL? How many programmers does it take to do that?
Perhaps the programmers are coding Production JCL and then running it through the syntax checker before handing it over to Operations. That would account for the # of access warnings. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
