_______________________________________________________________________________________

Note: This e-mail is subject to the disclaimer contained at the bottom of this 
message.
_______________________________________________________________________________________




>Date:    Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:47:21 -0400
>.From:    "King, Jeffrey E" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
>Subject: Re: VLF/LLA Management
>
>Stephen - 
>
>I'm not sure if you are familiar with or running CA-PDSMAN, but it
>provides a multitude of LLA management functions, including the
>automatic updating of the LLA cache for individual members in libraries
>being managed in Freeze mode.
>
>Regards,
>Jeffrey King
>CA
>PDSMAN Principle Support Engineer
>Columbus, Ohio USA
>Tel: +1 614 785 2743 or x62743
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Jeff,

We actually have PDSMAN installed, but unfortunately it was part of the
problem.
Originally, the private library was managed by CA-Quickfetch & PDSMAN to
manage the I/O for our IMS MPRS. We converted that to use LLA/VLF &
PDSMAN. Unfortunately sometime later it dropped out of LLA management
(IEACMD00 in SYS1.IBM.PARMLIB was the culprit - we thought that it was
being managed by our automation system), but we never really noticed due
to a processor & disk subsystem upgrades. I/O to this dataset averaged
at about 1.5 Million per hour (thank you  dynamic PAVS !).

Then, a few weekends ago we upgraded CICS from TS2.2 to TS 3.1 & DB2
from V7 to V8, and whammo! I/O skyrocketed to nearly 5 Million per Hour
(Dynamic PAVS saved our bacon, performance was very slow, but not enough
to kill the application altogether). Strobe indicated that PDSMAN,
whilst not the main culprit, was heavily involved in the I/O,
specifically the SPFEDIT enq. Most of the I/O was actually directory
searching. Putting the dataset back under LLA control dropped the I/O
dramatically and resolved performance issues, but PDSMAN is still
getting involved somehow in the I/O. So we are removing all PDSMAN
parameter entries for this dataset, and when we are happy, we will
re-review PDSMAN control for this dataset, based on Dev team
requirements.

The other thing is that this dataset is managed by our source management
software, and we want to control when it gets refreshed, which is not
necessarily at update time.

Thanks for the interest though (the local PDSMAN support have also
contacted me, and he is assisting in our research of this).

Thanks & Regards,

---------------------------------------------

Stephen Hall            
Team Leader - Host Systems
Technology Services - Infrastructure
INSURANCE AUSTRALIA GROUP (IAG)

www.iag.com.au
---------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________________________________________________

The information transmitted in this message and its attachments (if any) is 
intended 
only for the person or entity to which it is addressed.
The message may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, 
retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in 
reliance 
upon this information, by persons or entities other than the intended recipient 
is 
prohibited.

If you have received this in error, please contact the sender and delete this 
e-mail 
and associated material from any computer.

The intended recipient of this e-mail may only use, reproduce, disclose or 
distribute 
the information contained in this e-mail and any attached files, with the 
permission 
of the sender.

This message has been scanned for viruses with Symantec Scan Engine and cleared 
by 
MailMarshal.
_______________________________________________________________________________________

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to