On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 02:51:34 +0000, Ted MacNEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>I often see SYS1.ISF.SISF* , SYS1.ISP.SISP*, SYS1.GIM.SGIM* etc. even though the MLQ is redundant. > >I agree with the redundancy argument; what's wrong with each product having the same library name(s) at every site? > > >>Hard to change that stuff in a production environment... well, maybe not hard, just a PITA when there are batch processes and people with their own clists etc. > >In production, standards should be enforced, so it won't become a PITA. > (changed the subject since this has nothing to do with debuggers) What do local production standards have to do with the sysres names chosen for sysres dsns (perhaps years and years ago)? How would standards make it any easier to change? Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
