With the possible exception of the number of batch initiators started (with WLM managed inits a moot point) I have been opposed to different service definitions based on shift. With WLM, it is even more unnecessary IMHO. For example, if there is no IMP=2 work running on the system, IMP=3 work will run faster just by nature.
Wayne Driscoll Product Developer NOTE: All opinions are strictly my own. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anton Britz Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 2:39 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Adabas, zOs and WLM Hi, How many of you have different WLM defintions for a "Day" time load and a "Night" time load in zOs . The LPAR is running CICS, ADABAS, SHADOW ? I am trying to tell them the concept of having different WLM settings for the different parts of the day , is old fashioned ex. We have WEB applications now and there is no point in increasing the Batch priorities when the CICS's are doing nothing at night. Difficult to explain because they believe the Batch jobs will go faster at night if you UP the priorities in WLM. Warnings : Any of your responses might be distributed in our organization , so please talk slowly so that everybody will understand. Note: Opposing views/opinions are always tolerated because that is how all of us think about we do, before doing it. Thanks Anton ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
