Thats what I get for not reading the entire thread before posting a reply.
Someone after my post pointed out that with the new Cobol, you coudn't use
AMODE(24). Had I read that, I wouldn't have posted.
Eric Bielefeld
Sr. z/OS Systems Programmer
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
414-475-7434
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ted MacNEIL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: <IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU>
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 10:11 AM
Subject: Re: insane request: force load module to RMODE(24) AMODE(24)
>If this is really old code, what difference does it make if it runs in
>AMODE(24). I'm sure code that old wouldn't take up enough storage cause
>any problems.
Who said anything about storage problems?
I sure didn't.
I would be more concerned about addressability.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
