The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Packer) writes: > Personally I think we should have put a lot more effort into TSO and ISPF. > That's just a gut feeling... I can't give specifics. It's just knowing how > good CMS is that makes me feel that way about TSO. (And given that a lot > of my TSO usage is actually inside Batch I could see my Batch programming > benefiting also.) re: http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2008m.html#59 CHROME and WEB apps on Mainframe? http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2008m.html#60 CHROME and WEB apps on Mainframe? http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2008m.html#61 CHROME and WEB apps on Mainframe? parts of the company had a really, really hard time adapting to the 23jun69 unbundling announcement and starting to charge for application software ... misc. past posts mentiong 23jun69 unbundling announcement http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subtopic.html#unbundle including each organization's expense/run-rate had to be covered by their products' income. some organizations ... like the one that ISPF was part of .... continued to have ongoing problems dealing with the situation for a very long time. -- 40+yrs virtualization experience (since Jan68), online at home since Mar70 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
