On 1 Oct 2008 09:30:31 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ted MacNEIL) wrote:

>>It either protects people from doing something stupid (reading a dataset they 
>>did not ever write) and adds overhead (writing EOF to a file which
>will be properly written later anyway) 
>
>The overhead is miniscule in the scheme of things. 
>
>>I can see it being unsafe because reallocating a dataset with the same 
>>extents as one which was accidentally deleted is a technique sometimes
>used to salvage data.  

How different is this from tape marks (in the context of this thread)?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to