On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 12:06:07 -0600, Tom Marchant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 10:20:50 -0600, Bruno Sugliani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>... when a Z10 loses a fan in a computer room and phones IBM, and it is >>not treated ass a sev1 > >Sev 1? For a fan? I don't think so. If the loss of the fan had caused the >z10 to power off, *that* would have been a sev 1. > >-- >Tom Marchant Agree 100% I had put "and the bill increases " in my sentrence I did not mean that it should be flagged as a sev 1 What i meant is that if there is a danger that the bill increases or the goals are not met, there should be an alert somehow. Al Sherkow explained very well the situation: http://www.sherkow.com/updates/20081014cooling.html But i am convinced that we should warn before instead of adding automation mechanism after. But mainly we should not be content with it. Bruno Sugliani zxnetconsult(at)free(dot)fr ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
