I sure David is right. I'm talking about an independent monoplex. > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On > Behalf Of David Andrews > Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 4:57 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: Re: Activate lpar automatically? > > On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 04:19 -0600, Rafa Pereira wrote: > > Is there any issue about quiescing a test lpar if it is in a GRS RING > > together with a production lpar? > > Oh yes. Shutdown system TEST normally (don't QUIESCE or otherwise kill > the LPAR), then at the "production" LPAR enter: > V GRS(TEST),Q > V GRS(TEST),P > To detach it from the ring in a controlled fashion. You don't want ring > disruption. > > -- > David Andrews > A. Duda and Sons, Inc. > david.andr...@duda.com > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
