I was unaware that RMF III was required to get the 74(4)'s. I have recently
assumed this duty and will probably just go after the LPAR's that are part of
the plex and that alone will be enough to keep me busy for quite a while.
--- On Wed, 1/21/09, Skip Robinson <jo.skip.robin...@sce.com> wrote:
From: Skip Robinson <jo.skip.robin...@sce.com>
Subject: Re: No SMF 74(4)
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2009, 6:04 PM
Having stated that 74(4) is required for *all* LPARs, I need to back peddle
a bit. As I understand the process, 74(4) is needed to establish the
'qualifying sysplex function' in terms of usage of the relevant
structure.
For example, if you claim GRS star as the qualifying function, then you
need 74(4) to show that all purported sysplex members do indeed use
ISGLOCK.
If you have other nonmember LPARs running on any of the CECs in the
mix--either monoplex members or members of a different sysplex--then it's
not clear to me why you would need 74(4) records from the noncandidate
LPARs. If an LPAR is not offered up for verification, then who cares what
structures if any it uses?
On the other hand, gathering 74(4) from *all* LPARs may in the end be
easier than getting someone to sign off with data gathered selectively. I
took the easy way out and submitted data from all LPARs. Such a wuss.
.
.
JO.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
626-302-7535 Office
323-715-0595 Mobile
jo.skip.robin...@sce.com
Patrick Falcone
<patrick.falcone7
@VERIZON.NET> To
Sent by: IBM IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Mainframe cc
Discussion List
<ibm-m...@bama.ua Subject
.edu> Re: No SMF 74(4)
01/21/2009 09:44
AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe
Discussion List
<ibm-m...@bama.ua
.edu>
(@#*(*#E)!
Thanks Mark and yes, right on Skip.
From: Mark Zelden <mark.zel...@zurichna.com>
Subject: Re: No SMF 74(4)
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2009, 4:39 PM
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 07:32:26 -0800, Patrick Falcone
<patrick.falco...@verizon.net> wrote:
>Can't seem to find type 74(4) after adding a new member to the plex.
Any
not obvious, or obvious, reasons? Seems to be in SMF/RMF.
>
Doesn't that come from RMF III? Is RMFGAT running?
Mark
--
Mark Zelden
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
