If possible, convert the file to extended format and use system managed 
buffering (covered in VSAM Demystified).  It's easier to implement than BLSR.  
It will probably use more memory than BLSR, but that can be controlled easily 
if necessary.  I've had great results with it.  The programmers of the first 
application I tried it on were so happy they bought me a fruit basket for 
Christmas. ;-)

db

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
Farley, Peter x23353
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 6:53 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: VSAM BLSR

> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On 
> Behalf Of David Speake
> Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 6:29 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: VSAM BLSR
> 
> I have a customer with what they perceive as a memory problem,
Reviewing
> their JCL I feel otherwise. There are some VSAM  BLSR  values that I 
> seriously question. I have written a response but am now having
insecurity
> issues - its been a while and although  "VSAM Demystified" and "DFSMS 
> Using Data Sets" seem to confirm most of my material, I'd sure like to 
> see a z/OS R1.9 VSAM PLM for a few hours.
> 
> I have my beach towel handy in case the egg on my face get real deep.
> Comments and pointers appreciated.

I would agree that the BUFSI/BUFSD specifications do not appear to be helpful.  
I can't confirm if there would in fact be wasted memory, but my question to the 
customer would be, "Why specify BUFSI/BUFSD at all?
Why not let the system use the actual values for the buffer sizes as it finds 
them?".  Especially because they are, in fact, the same for both files.

I can confirm that the BUFND specifications are in fact cumulative.
When we first implemented a huge application with BLSR in the OS390 days, we 
had to be careful that for all SHRPOOL's added together, all the BUFND's times 
BUFSD did not exceed the 2GiB region limit.  This was for RRDS's, so no BUFNI 
was involved, though I would assume the same is true for BUFNI as for BUFND.

HTH

Peter


This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee 
and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader 
of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this 
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any 
attachments from your system.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to