Concur. Besides, is there a (greater?) risk in setting it too low? Q: What is too low? A: Beats me.
Lastly, what once was is often no more. ROT sometimes becomes superstition. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 1:01 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Suggested MEMLIMIT value for SMFPRMxx >I "penalize" people for trying to specify MEMLIMIT (they are knocked down to >5G if they try to go higher than 5G, but they can specify something lower). >In other words, I don't want the users to have to worry about specifing >MEMLIMIT ever and I will control it via SMFPRMxx or IEFUSI What will you do when users need more than 5G? I do NOT believe these parameters should be left up to the SYSPROG, rather it should be the business. And, before you tell me there's a risk, let me point out that needs rarely occur overnight. Growth into larger needs is usually gradual, and with monitoring and planning, they can/should be handled effectively. - Too busy driving to stop for gas! NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The message, together with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete all copies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
