In <3289299314261205.wa.paulgboulderaim....@listserv.ua.edu>, on
08/21/2012
at 09:58 AM, Paul Gilmartin <paulgboul...@aim.com> said:
>But IBM, with little clue, requires ISPPLIB to be allocated when
>running ISPF in batch. It might, rather be a courtesy for ISPSTART
>in batch to fail if ISPPLIB _is_ allocated, with a warning
That would be an incredibly dumb thing for IBM to do, and breaking
ISPF would hardly be a faver to the user.
>to the apparently clueless user.
That comment explains why you are waiting for PKB, since you are
joining Poncelet in calling people clueless just because you don't
understand the issues.
>It has since deteriorated into name-calling.
PKB..
>you started it,
Wrong again.
>(Awaiting PKB.)
See above.
>Using JCL to start a terminal session doesn't count.
ROTF.LMAO!
>And I'll confess that as a POC I have used a batch job to launch
>ISPGUI, using panels, largely cluelessly.
Well, that doesn't surprise me.
>But I consider that interactive as opposed to batch. In OS,
>everything starts with JCL; there must be another meaningful
>distinction between batch and interactive.
There are several. RTFM,
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
