On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 12:03 AM, Ed Gould <edgould1...@comcast.net> wrote:
> Tom: > > How about MVS 2.0 ? I'm not Tom, but I'm quite sure that was Version 1 Release 2 Modification Level 0. As others have noted, "You can't have a Release 0". This is all muddied by inconsistency in including the Version number. VM, for instance, had VM/XA 1.0 and VM/ESA 1.0 (among others) because the "Version 1" was implicit (or not even thought of, perhaps). Product versioning is arcane and varies across vendors and even within vendors; some folks think 2.9.13b is somehow more useful/meaningful than just going to 2.9.14. I don't, but that's me. -- zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
