No. Interlink's TCP stack is still available from CA as RUNTCP.
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Paul Gilmartin <paulgboul...@aim.com> wrote: > On Thu, 7 Feb 2013 08:27:37 -0600, Steve Thompson wrote: > > > >Well, actually, Sterling, as an entity, was broken into two parts some > >years ago. > > > >Sterling Commerce (The MFT (Managed File Transfer), and fullfillment > >suite(s), etc.,) was acquired by IBM a bit over two years ago. I can't > >remember what the other Sterling company was called or its product line. > > > >The MFT products were, off the top of my head, Connect:Direct, > >Connect::Enterprise, Connect::Express, Sterling Secure Proxy, Sterling > >External Authentication, File Agent, and Sterling Control Center. > > > Was this the TCP/IP stack, acquired (IIRC) as Interlink? The TCP/IP > stack that some sites continued to use in preference to IBM's because > it did not require OMVS? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interlink_Computer_Sciences > > -- gil > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- This is a test of the Emergency Broadcast System. If this had been an actual emergency, do you really think we'd stick around to tell you? Maranatha! <>< John McKown ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
