In fact, if IBM really does consider this, they might as well also build a 
near-real-time security monitoring product for Z, using CDPz as a source pump.
Maybe Z Operations Insight Suite already has security-specific 
dashboard(s)/reports...

- KB

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Saturday, July 4, 2020 9:22 AM, kekronbekron 
<000002dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> Besides, any opportunity that allows others to poke at the platform, is an 
> opportunity well-left (for IBM).
>
> However, since IBM now has controls like
> a) ALLOWUSERKEY
> b) z/OS Authorized Code Scanner
> c) near-real-time interfaces to SMF and tools like CDPz
>
> ... they should be capable of seting up a tightened & fully monitored 
> environment.
> Don't believe the above will allow for messing around / learning HCD & other 
> I/O stuff, without them building an sim/emulated env. for that level of 
> control.
>
> -   KB
>
>     ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>     On Saturday, July 4, 2020 9:16 AM, kekronbekron wrote:
>
>
> > Would love to know more about what your FICON buddy is working on Grant.
> > If you wanna share (prefer off-list?), please email :)
> > Unless IBM explicitly sets up college courses or NDA-tied free-roam access 
> > or whatever, it's only going to be the likes of zAcademy, i.e., restricted 
> > lab environments to basically market at the command-line, much like walking 
> > the dotten line in an acquarium/zoo/etc. (if you turn to your right, you 
> > can issue 2 commands to Spark on Z)
> > Funny though, because isn't this exactly what Time Sharing Option was, when 
> > it was first introduced?
> >
> > -   KB
> >     ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> >     On Friday, July 3, 2020 9:48 PM, Grant Taylor 
> > 0000023065957af1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On 7/3/20 10:12 AM, Grant Taylor wrote:
> > >
> > > > I know multiple people that have CPCs.  But they don't currently have
> > > > DASD.  I think at least one of them has a line on legal licenses for
> > > > z/OS for his CPC.
> > >
> > > One of the people I know is developing his own FICON connected DASD by
> > > reading any and all documents he can get his hands on.
> > > What do we, as the mainframe community, and IBM, as the big name, need
> > > to do to encourage these extremely creative, resourceful, and driven
> > > people better access to a functioning mainframe so that they can use
> > > their creative talents and drive to help further the mainframe?
> > > There are a group of hobbyists and enthusiasts that have taken MVS 3.8j,
> > > which decidedly does not include REXX or prerequisites therefor, and
> > > backported (?) REXX to it, including re-creating any prerequisites.
> > > This is the creative and enthusiastic spirit that created Unix 50 years
> > > ago and helped Linux become what it is today. Just think for a moment
> > > where the mainframe could be in 10 or 20 years if even some of these
> > > creative efforts were directed at enhancing the mainframe.
> > > Grant. . . .
> > > unix || die
> > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> --
>
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to