I thought most of the article was excellent. She did miss the one point we discussed, though, that the parts of the systems that were being overloaded were ~not~ the parts driven by COBOL and running on the mainframe, but the newer and more fashionable segments of the systems.
Good article overall, though. --- Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313 /* In all affairs it's a healthy thing now and then to hang a question mark on the things you have long taken for granted. -Bertrand Russell (1872-1970) */ -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Roger W Suhr Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2020 12:27 I couldn't agree more! -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of Mark Regan Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2020 11:41 https://www.planetmainframe.com/2020/07/still-cobol-after-all-these-years/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
