Am I missing something obvious, here? In what computer language(s) is a move not actually a copy? And how?
--- Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313 /* In science one tries to tell people, in such a way as to be understood by everyone, something that no one ever knew before....in poetry, it's the exact opposite. -Paul Dirac */ -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of David Crayford Sent: Friday, July 17, 2020 00:53 I beg to differ! For the programming languages I code in use there is a huge difference between copy and move semantics. --- On 2020-07-17 11:12 AM, Tony Thigpen wrote: > From the start, MOVE in the programming world has been equated to what > you are calling a COPY. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
