The issue in contention is the wording of the text, not its location. I never claimed that it was in the right manual.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf of Robin Vowels <robi...@dodo.com.au> Sent: Friday, September 4, 2020 9:04 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Constant Identifiers "Seymour J Metz" <sme...@gmu.edu> wrote in message news:bl0pr05mb5156e311e88735a8afbef5ca99...@bl0pr05mb5156.namprd05.prod.outlook.com... > If you don't care about maintainable code than should is to strong. > If you care about maintainable code then should is too weak. The purpose of a LRM is to tell you what facilities are available. Not to impose programming conventions or rules -- that's the prerogative of the installation. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
