That might indeed be interesting if I knew what SUBSYS=PIPE was. Is that the z/OS BatchPipes product? If so I do not have that available here.
Peter -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of Martin Packer Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 4:31 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SORT question: How to both remove records from a file AND write removed records to a 2nd output? EXTERNAL EMAIL OUTFIL SPLIT. Something also from the mists of time, by no coincidence, is this: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.icea100/ice2ca_Example_11._Sort_with_Pipes_and_OUTFIL_SPLIT.htm__;!!Ebr-cpPeAnfNniQ8HSAI-g_K5b7VKg!djsBTdtRWhlMDjqIDWZ3N2tii2HhPjYswgwHMqZah3Ae3uJs0JFjTuTVRzoFQonkEIOCWw$ TBH, I probably wrote that and Frank made it worth reading. :-) Cheers, Martin Martin Packer Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM +44-7802-245-584 email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker Blog: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mainframeperformancetopics.com__;!!Ebr-cpPeAnfNniQ8HSAI-g_K5b7VKg!djsBTdtRWhlMDjqIDWZ3N2tii2HhPjYswgwHMqZah3Ae3uJs0JFjTuTVRzoFQokXweXXaQ$ Mainframe, Performance, Topics Podcast Series (With Marna Walle): https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://anchor.fm/marna-walle__;!!Ebr-cpPeAnfNniQ8HSAI-g_K5b7VKg!djsBTdtRWhlMDjqIDWZ3N2tii2HhPjYswgwHMqZah3Ae3uJs0JFjTuTVRzoFQokxmRitYQ$ Youtube channel: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCu_65HaYgksbF6Q8SQ4oOvA__;!!Ebr-cpPeAnfNniQ8HSAI-g_K5b7VKg!djsBTdtRWhlMDjqIDWZ3N2tii2HhPjYswgwHMqZah3Ae3uJs0JFjTuTVRzoFQonXW_nH9A$ From: Paul Gilmartin <0000000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Date: 22/09/2020 20:31 Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: SORT question: How to both remove records from a file AND write removed records to a 2nd output? Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 20:08:12 +0100, Martin Packer wrote: > >SAVE has, to my mind, been most invaluable. Prior to this you had to >figure out the boolean complement of the INCLUDE= clause. With more >than one INCLUDE= clause in a sort it became hairier, requiring De >Morgan's Law*. :-) SAVE made this a lot simpler and less error prone. > Yet adding a NOT operator to the grammar (no one has mentioned that there is one) would relieve programmers of the chore of rewriting complex Boolean expressions with De Morgan's Law. >"Card Dealer" not so much. > I don't know "Card Dealer". Does that amount to having multiple OUTFILs using different tags? Thanks, gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
