On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 08:18:10 -0600 Paul Gilmartin
<0000000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

:>On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 14:34:03 +0200, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
:>
:>>On Wed, 30 Dec 2020 19:21:52 +0000 Billy Ashton wrote:
:>>
:>>:>Hey folks! I have a vendor product program that looks for different
:>>:>DDnames depending on the control statements passed into the program. Is
:>>:>there any way to define a dynamic DD statement using JCL symbols? For
:>>:>example, I would love to have //TB&tno.DAT to correspond to TB01DAT,
:>>:>TB14DAT, or TB67DAT if I use SET TNO=01 or 14 or 67.
::>>:>Is such a thing possible? I tried using an instream proc definition and
:>>:>INCLUDE MEMBER= that proc name, but that failed, and of course, I tried
:>>:>the straight up JCL as above, and it failed.
:
:>>:>What do you all think?
:
:>>If you create a member for each DD statement,
:
:>>         // INCLUDE MEMBER=TAB&NO
:
:>>should work fine. Or am I missing something?

:>Gee.  One might create a collection of JCLLIB members mapping the
:>Cartesian product of all possible values of all possible symbols.  Then
:>no such member need contain any symbol references.

There can be multiple iINCLUDE statements (with a dummy as a default). Not at
all a problem.

:>Seriously?  There's something wrong here.

:>I hate JCL!

That is a different issue.

--
Binyamin Dissen <bdis...@dissensoftware.com>
http://www.dissensoftware.com

Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel


Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.

I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems,
especially those from irresponsible companies.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to