A default might change? I am shocked. Shocked.
Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Peter Relson Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2021 4:29 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: This Call-Assembler-inside-COBOL technique works, but is it risky to use? Make sure that the storage for this lands in code that is "executable=yes" (I have no idea if the compiler would put this into storage obtained for the module as opposed to something more dynamic). Imagine if, some day, the default for STORAGE OBTAIN changes from executable=no to executable=yes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
