It was a decision made above my level and somewhat political and before I started working at this site. >From what I understand the operations manager did not what the operators >responsible for reacting to console messages, they'd contact the systems >group, day or night on some highlighted checks till my predecessor just never >started HC, when I performed the first upgrade on my 2 PROD LPARS I started HC >and all He$$ broke loose. if I ever get time to manage the HC checks I may >revisit this, but for now, it's just not on my radar with new hardware and new >OS installs and I'm.....that guy, the only guy Carmen Vitullo
-----Original Message----- From: Peter <rel...@us.ibm.com> To: IBM-MAIN <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> Date: Wednesday, 24 March 2021 7:38 AM CDT Subject: Re: Upgrade from z/os 2.3 to 2.4 decrease PVT storage >my site does not want HC running in prod (2.3) Can you share any information about "why"? They don't like to hear where they are not implementing best practices? HC is expected not to change anything; it informs. And obviously they can turn off individual checks as they choose (or, in many cases, configure them to check for what they want checked). Peter Relson z/OS Core Technology Design ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
