For some processor models -- I forget whether S/360 or later -- add-on memory 
vendors would install more memory than IBM designed for, expanding memory 
address/data buses to allow it. And of course when such processors returned to 
IBM they had to be de-extended, returned to IBM's limited address range. It 
must have been fun selling maintaining competitive memory.

Quoting:

All the focus on early memory prices also glosses over the fact that when the 
S/360 was introduced in 1964 even the largest models had a physical memory 
limit of 8 MiB, and the S/360 architectural limit was only 16 MiB. If you used 
a memory-extravagant design and created an application requiring memory beyond 
available limits, the cost of memory became effectively infinite - not 
available at any price. Larger record sizes impacted requirements for not only 
main memory but external storage capacity and channel bandwidth and processing 
time to manipulate the data. There definitely was a mindset in place in earlier 
days that placed great value on conserving all hardware resources as much as 
possible, to the point of obsession in some cases. If you exceeded available 
resources then, the hardware upgrade cost was more likely to be 
cost-prohibitive, or the upgrade might not even be possible.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to