"You can program in C in any language":
(NOSUBSCRIPTRANGE)(NOSTRINGRANGE)BEGIN;
DECLARE X(50);
DO I=1 TO 100;
X(I) = 0;
END;
END;
"But it saves 2.7 femtoseconds!"
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
David Crayford [dcrayf...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2021 1:54 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: New Java vulnerability
On 14/12/21 12:12 pm, Andrew Rowley wrote:
> On 14/12/2021 12:30 am, Filip Palian wrote:
>> My intention was to share information about the vulnerabilities
>> affecting
>> Java language. (Without performing a proper comparison) I'd prefer
>> not to
>> get into discussion about one language being less secure than another.
> "Java is insecure" is an implicit comparison with other languages. If
> there isn't another language that is more secure, the statement is as
> I said, unfair.
Not as insecure as C and the notorious buffer overflow exploits due to
poor language/library design. Java is noway near as insecure and as you
say this issue is due to an vulnerability in a library.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
