Ensure that CSA and ECSA are large enough that SETPROG LPA,ADD and SETPROG LPA,DELETE don't have fragmentation issues.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Rob Schramm [rob.schr...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 4, 2022 8:13 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: LPA Listers, I am feeling particularly annoyed. I don't want to use LPALSTxx for products. I want to be able to upgrade a product with a minimum of fuss. I would like to use PROGXX and manage LPA dynamically. But the PROGxx and SETPROG seem woefully under-powered for such a thing. This is more pointed when systems have infrequent IPLs. Rob Schramm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
