Um. AT&T's approval or otherwise isn't relevant. They're not a party to this.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 10:41 AM Bill Johnson < 00000047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > I doubt IBM acted without the approval of AT&T. > > IBM rejected the decision and said it intends to appeal the ruling. > > "This verdict is entirely unsupported by fact and law, and IBM intends to > pursue complete reversal on appeal," IBM said in an emailed statement. "IBM > acted in good faith in every respect in this engagement. The decision to > remove BMC Software technology from its mainframes rested solely with AT&T, > as was recognized by the court and confirmed in testimony from AT&T > representatives admitted at trial." ® > > It’ll be reversed. > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > > On Friday, June 3, 2022, 10:37 AM, zMan <zedgarhoo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > https://www.theregister.com/2022/05/31/ibm_ordered_to_pay_16/ > > Tsk. IBM appears to have been caught red-handed here. > -- > zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it" > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
