Sorry, thought it was understood from the context. Unexpected nodes = folks "poking" at the mainframe with their scripts, at the NJE interface.
- KB ------- Original Message ------- On Sunday, August 21st, 2022 at 6:16 PM, Radoslaw Skorupka <r.skoru...@hotmail.com> wrote: > W dniu 21.08.2022 o 14:09, kekronbekron pisze: > > > > IMHO JES will not allow any job without RACF userid. > > > It's not a matter of opinion.. > > > Haven't you seen jobs or ad-hoc STCs show up with a 'Owner' of ++++++++ ? > > > I don't know entirely, maybe +++++++ is defined as an ID by default in > > > some/all ESMs. > > What about JES(BATCHALLRACF)? Can you comment it? Doesn't it work? > Regarding ++++++++ - yes and no. Yes, I've seen it. No, NOT IN MY SHOP. > > > > It is not good idea to have NJE with untrusted nodes. > > > True, however, it's not about expected nodes. > > > Some years ago, I've seen a script called iNJEktor or something. > > > It'll try to brute force connect to nodes. > > > If I'm remembering right, after we all witnessed the song & dance about > > > this script, IBM added some extra security measures for NJE. > > > Expected nodes? Are they any unexpected ones? > This is part technical problem (do no allow them) and part > organizational. The second one is very serious, because it means lack of > control over whole mainframe environment. > > > > -- > Radoslaw Skorupka > Lodz, Poland ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
