Food for thought - separate MAS for each environment, but same
SYSPLEX. Though better to have each environment in separate SYSPLEX
and MAS. (That also allows better separation for implementing
changes to each environment.
Michael)
At 01:16 PM 12/8/2022, Michael Babcock wrote:
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
We have a 3 system plex, with two of those systems, DEV and PROD, in
a JES2 MAS. We had an incident recently where a development job
got into a loop and used up all spool. This in turn, caused our
PROD system to come to, basically, a screeching halt.
Management wants to investigate removing PROD from the MAS.
Beyond the obvious cons below, what else am I missing? Will a cold
start be required?
CONS:
1. No longer monitor production jobs from DEV
2. User's will need to logon to production to check on production jobs
3. Significant changes to desk procedures
4. May require changes to production jobs and/or CA7 (convert from
SYSAFF to ROUTE XEQ)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
