'Display Catalog Name' doesn't seem to affect my performance either (1.13) but checking 'Display Total Tracks' makes a noticeable difference, from near instantaneous for Initial View 2 of 11K datasets, to about 20 seconds.
MA On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 06:37:31 +0200, nitz-...@gmx.net <nitz-...@gmx.net> wrote: >> I'm guessing that the catalog display feature is dragging you down. >> Uncheck that option on the 3.4 entry panel and I bet your 3.4 flies >> again. If you want the catalogs, then make sure you're using VLF >> caching for your catalogs. > >Just went to my 1.13 system and tested this on a list of maybe 60 datasets. >Using an initial view of 1 (Volume) the list appears 'in the blink of an eye'. >When I set that to 2 (Space) it takes noticeably longer (1-2s). Catalog >display feature on or off doesn't make any noticeable difference. > >Just as a test for the OP: When you go in with initial view Volume and then >toggle through the views via pf11 - how long does that take? As far as I >remember, this toggling for space information has always taken very long on >prior releases, too. > >Barbara > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
