Right, and if it's marked that way then there should be no issue if there is a separate LINK or LOAD for each use, or at least if there is an issue I don't understand what it is.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Andrew Rowley [and...@blackhillsoftware.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2023 5:39 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Are JNI required to be re-entrant and/or re-usable? On 16/02/2023 6:40 am, Steve Smith wrote: > If you're confused, it's probable that you didn't read all his words. The OP did say that the assembler module is *known* to be not reusable i.e. each call needs a new copy. Speculation about *maybe* it's not reusable and whether that was intended seems to be confused. -- Andrew Rowley Black Hill Software ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
