One place I did this by design was when I was decommisioning DASD. I would use 1 job of ICKDSF TRKFMT per logical volume and 1 name for each physical array in the box. When they wanted me to rush, I would do 2 names for each physical array, but the thrashing would slow each job. The two jobs would finish in about 75% of running two in sequence. Starting a 3rd name lead to so much thrashing we go very little decrease in time so I stopped those after 1 night.
So running 1 jobname at a time allowed the queing of jobs to kick off over a couple of weeks as other jobs completed. On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht <elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za> wrote: > I have given this thread a new name. So flame me... ;-) > > Strange no one came with another reason why duplicate jobnames are to be > prohibited or allowed. > -- Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
